AI development & automation

AI-assisted workflows for documents, text and repetitive tasks, with clear controls for reviewing outputs and handling exceptions.

Problems this addresses

  • A task involves reading, classifying or extracting information from documents or text that varies too much for fixed rules alone.
  • Manual review of routine documents consumes time that could go toward exceptions and judgement calls.
  • You want to explore where AI could help, but need a clear view of what it can and can't be trusted to do unsupervised.

Examples of what this can include

  • Document data extraction with a human review step before data is accepted
  • Text classification or routing — for example, sorting enquiries or requests
  • Drafting assistance reviewed by a person before use
  • Automation of repetitive multi-step tasks between existing systems
  • Simple rule-based automation where AI isn't the right tool, evaluated honestly alongside AI options

Our Document Review demo is an illustrative example of a reviewed extraction workflow. It uses a predefined result rather than a live AI service, so the review experience can be explored without depending on one — our initial illustrative example is document preparation for bookkeeping and accounting firms, but the same pattern applies more broadly.

Scope and deliverables

Agreed upfront: the specific task the AI-assisted step targets, what "correct" looks like for that task, and where human review sits in the workflow.

Defined together during scoping: acceptable error handling, the review interface itself, and how edge cases are flagged rather than silently accepted.

Process for this service

The same definition, design, build-and-verify, and operation stages described in our approach apply here, with an explicit evaluation stage that compares AI-assisted, simpler rule-based and manual options before committing to build anything.

Integrations and constraints we evaluate

  • Where the documents or text actually originate, and in what format.
  • Data sensitivity — what can be processed, by which provider, and what must stay restricted.
  • Volume and variability of inputs, which affects both feasibility and cost.
  • Acceptable error rates and the consequences of an incorrect result going unreviewed.

What affects budget and timeline

These factors shape the scope of a quote — we don't set prices or delivery dates without reviewing your specific project.

  • The volume and variability of the documents or text involved.
  • Whether a general-purpose AI service is adequate or a more tailored approach is needed.
  • The complexity of the human-review interface required.
  • Data-handling and confidentiality requirements specific to your sector.

Frequently asked questions

How accurate is the AI?

Accuracy depends on the task, the data and the provider used — we don't state a fixed figure. Review and approval controls are defined according to the task, its risks and the agreed scope, precisely because AI output shouldn't be trusted unsupervised by default.

What happens to our data if we use an AI service?

This depends on the provider chosen for the task and is agreed explicitly before any real data is processed. Nothing is sent to a third-party AI service without that being confirmed with you first.

Is the Document Review demo using a real AI service?

No — it uses a predefined result to illustrate the review workflow. A real implementation would use an AI service appropriate to your data and task, evaluated and agreed with you.

Could a simpler automation solve this without AI?

Often, yes. We evaluate rule-based automation and system integrations alongside AI, and recommend AI only where it's genuinely the better fit.

Who reviews the AI's output?

Whoever you assign. Review and approval controls are defined according to the task, its risks and the agreed scope — not left to fully automated decision-making by default.

Have a document or automation workflow in mind?

Tell us what the task involves and where review needs to happen.

Request a project quote